Nevertheless, if you know the structure and know what to do in each part of your research, nothing is impossible! Secondly, you have to state your thesis.
This is very important to make it right, so look for some thesis examples on the web. Your next step is making an outline. Keep in mind that all the points should correlate to your research paper topic. Introduction — present your thesis here and explain, in brief, what the main goal of your euthanasia research paper is and why your potential readers should be interested in it. In your body you have to give all the arguments you have to support your thesis.
As it is not an essay, the number of arguments should be much bigger than in your essay on unemployment. Finish your body with the strongest argument you have prepared. Conclusion — the same as usual: Your final task is to organize your notes, make corrections where it is needed and so on.
After you do it, type the final draft and your euthanasia research paper is done! Well, as you can see, it is absolutely possible to write an essay or research paper yourself. But we understand that sometimes you simply have no time for it, as you have to do other tasks too.
We are an academic writing company that has already helped a lot of students to succeed in studying. Our professional writers can do any written assignment of any difficulty and in any discipline.
Let us help you write your essay or research paper! We guarantee the highest quality of your order for really affordable prices! Submit your application to EssayShark. The intention to deliberately accelerate the death of an incurable patient, even to stop his suffering, has never been unambiguous. The English philosopher Francis Bacon introduced the term euthanasia to denote light painless death, that is, calm and light death, without torment and suffering.
The doctor is obligated to ease the suffering of the dying by all available and legal methods. More and more people think that euthanasia is much more humane in some cases than life Piccirilli Dorsey, Inc. Nevertheless, it is necessary to find out whether people have the right to decide if someone needs to die or to live further.
This question is of interest to both ordinary people and doctors. What is more, it is unlikely that humanity will come to a single denominator in this matter.
That is why there are arguments for and against euthanasia. To start with, the specific reasons for the legalization of euthanasia are as follows. Euthanasia makes it possible to fully exercise the human right to dispose of their lives, including making decisions on the termination of their own lives. Thirdly, euthanasia provides the implementation of one of the fundamental principles of law, the principle of humanism. Euthanasia is humane because it stops the suffering and torment of an incurably sick person.
The state and society must recognize this right not for everyone, but for the sake of the small group of people who need it Strinic, Visnja. Analyzing their decisions about euthanasia, it can be seen that, in most cases, the court did not take into account the material aspect of the cases, but resolved them on the basis of violations of the procedural form.
However, it should be recalled that, in fact, in all civilized countries, a murder of compassion persists in practice regardless of whether it is permitted by law or not. Consequently, in countries where euthanasia is prohibited, where there is no legal protection against the misuse of euthanasia, the situation is worse. The legalization of euthanasia must go through some scientific, legislative filters that will establish rules, specific criteria and cases when such a right can be realized.
Only controlled procedures and clear rules for the use of euthanasia will end the arbitrary system existing in many European countries Assistance To Patients At End Of Life. First of all, it is believed that suicide with assistance or euthanasia is death with dignity because it occurs quickly.
He offers his first hand account of meeting with the Grim Reaper: I lay at the point of death. A congestive heart failure was treated for diagnostic purposes by an angiogram that triggered a stroke.
Violent and painful hiccups, uninterrupted for several days and nights, prevented the ingestion of food. My left side and one of my vocal chords became paralyzed.
Some form of pleurisy set in, and I felt like I was drowning in a sea of slime. In one of my lucid intervals during those days of agony, I asked my physician to discontinue all life-supporting services or show me how to do it. Hook feels as though he was robbed of the peaceful serenity of death and will have to suffer through it once more, when death comes knocking again.
Arguments for and against euthanasia are cause for major debate. Proponents and opponents disagree on at least four controversial issues. The four major issues are, but not limited to, the nature autonomy, the role of beneficence, the distinction between active and passive euthanasia and the public and social implications of legalization. The nature of autonomy basically means that all people are granted the right to think, feel and act for him or herself.
The distinction between passive and active euthanasia, or killing and allowing one to die. Euthanasia is a serious topic because it goes against the norms of traditional medicine. Euthanasia is not always applied to terminally patients either. People who have been in serious accidents, or who have debilitating diseases such as severe cases of Cerebral Palsy, Multiple Sclerosis, Muscular Dystrophy, and Cerebral Vascular Diseases which lead to strokes and heart attacks are often in consideration for the application of euthanasia.
In other words, these patients cannot act or speak for themselves or in addition, respond to much stimulus. Personal experience and opinion may be a factor that weighs heavily on the issue of euthanasia, but the real substance comes from the facts.
The legal ramifications play a major role in the legalization of euthanasia. Euthanasia began with its roots in both the Hippocratic tradition and the Judeo-Christian ethic of sanctity of life, Western medicine has long opposed the practice of physician-assisted suicide.
However, the controversy over euthanasia is not new. Ohio is the only state in the United States of America that does not explicitly prohibit euthanasia by jurisdiction of the federal law.
Caleb Dimitrivich, an oncologist, who most directly works with terminally ill patients at St. The Hemlock society is a major proponent in assisted suicide. They ought to have the option of a peaceful, gentle, certain and swift death in the company of their loved ones. Along with this law certain safeguards should be in place such as; a diagnoses of a terminal or irreversible illness by two independent physicians, an evaluation by a mental health professional, a written and witnessed request that is revocable at any time, a waiting period, and monitoring by a state health department.
The American Medical Association strictly opposes the use of euthanasia. While modern advances in medical science and technology have helped physicians to treat patients with once critical and life-threatening illnesses, some of these new technologies have merely prolonged the suffering for patients.
The AMA still maintains that physicians should practice medicine with respectful and compassionate attitudes. One pro-life group called Not Dead Yet, understands that people have the right to refuse unwanted treatment. CURE is another pro-life group. Their reasons are for compassion and unity. Uniting together will bring strength and a prolonged life. One of their reasons is complications that can occur from usage.
Panic, feelings of terror, and assaultive behavior can take place from the drug-induced confusion. Other problems can include difficulty in taking the drug and a number of days elapsing before death occurs. They believe that euthanasia is not giving the right to die but the right to kill. There are other alternatives like Hospice which tries to make the patients remaining time comfortable, alleviating pains, and giving spiritual and emotional support. Jack Kevorkian, a 71 year old retired pathologist, is known to many as the patriarch of assisted suicide.
He is currently serving a sentence of in a Michigan correctional facility for his involvement in helping at least people die from euthanasia.
He was charged for murder in both and when patients of his used a suicide machine he developed, and his medical licence was revoked. Both charges were later dropped though when state judges pointed out that there were no laws against assisted suicide in the state of Michigan.
He served some jail time when he refused to pay the bail after the judge raised it. He was released from jail though later that year when supporters posted the bail.
The Case for Euthanasia - In order to provide a framework for my thesis statement on the morality of euthanasia, it is first necessary to define what euthanasia is and the different types of euthanasia.
Essay, term paper research paper on Euthanasia. One of the most hotly debated topics going on now is the one concerning the ethics of assisted suicide and euthanasia.
Such unnatural extension of a person’s anguish has lead to an increasing number of euthanasia supports, who view the practice of euthanasia as ways and means to a peaceful, dignified, humane and self determined death. Essay Euthanasia Mark T. Maxwell Abstract This paper will define Euthanasia and assisted suicide. Euthanasia is often confused with and associated with assisted suicide, definitions of the two are required. Two perspectives shall be presented in this paper. The first perspective will favor euthanasia or the "right to die," the second perspective will favor antieuthanasia, or the "right to live".
Euthanasia is a unique practice of ending the life of an individual suffering from a terminal disease/illness or an incurable condition by means of the. Do you wonder what 'euthanasia' means when your teacher asks you to write essays on euthanasia? Learn how to write such paper using the best ideas and structure.