In connection to this, some people raise questions about the expediency of using the death penalty or torture as a punishment for severe crimes. And while capital punishment is a norm in a number of American states as well as in countries around the world , the propriety of tortures is a much more debated question.
Today, torture is rightly seen as a medieval and inhumane way of treating a human being, regardless of its origin, social status, or any crimes committed. A number of influential treaties prohibit the use of torture. For example, article 3: Therefore, on a legislative level, the use of torture is not acceptable. In the United States, for example, it is guaranteed by the 8th Amendment of the Constitution. However, accepting torture as, for example, a method of interrogation, means citizens can no longer feel safe if they have to deal with justice, even and especially if they are innocent.
In this case, an investigative error and the following suspicion of an innocent person can result into the application of severe psychological and physical damage to this individual before their innocence becomes evident. Examples are numerous, but they illustrate one fact: Torture in the modern world is a relic of the distant past.
Though there are many proponents, claiming that torture is acceptable in a number of certain cases—such as against terrorists or maniacs—I believe they should not be tolerated due to several reasons. The country that approves torture also risks to lose the trust of its citizens in itself and its judicial system. In addition, torture that is officially approved at least once tends to become a regular practice.
Is English your native language? What is your profession? In particular, a variety of torture is widely used in ancient Egypt, Assyria, Ancient Greece, Ancient Rome and other ancient nations. Torture — is the infliction of deliberate torture both physical and mental in order to obtain information or to punishment.
In a broad sense, torture is considered as any procedure causing human suffering and pain, regardless of the circumstances and objectives, regardless of whether the sentence ends with this procedure or followed by homicide.
This would therefore not apply to what we consider enemy combatants, primarily terrorists who do not fight under a flag or in a uniform and do not fight for any particular state. Among people, their personal tolerance and the lack of information do not allow them to fully imagine the situations when torture is used, the cruelty that was prevented with the help of torture methods. There is a lot that the society does not know, and, for example, for the terrorists torture can be a unique way of getting information.
Under torture, false testimony can be given as innocent and guilty, as a betrayal of the traditions of the countries can been considered as a grave sin. At the same time, there are exceptions. If the evidence can be quickly checked repeatedly for example, if you want to know the lock code or the location of the safe money in the apartment , it tries to be able to learn the correct information.
If the authorities are able to identify even a small number of underground workers, it is more important than a large number of innocent victims, from the standpoint of the authorities of torture in this case can also be effective.
There was a special resonance to news reports on torture of Iraqi prisoners by Americans at Abu Ghraib prison. To avoid the use of such methods in in the United States has passed a special law on the treatment of detainees- The Detainee Treatment Act. The majority of people find torture unnecessary and claim that it is not effective any more. There are many other ways to prove whether the person it telling the truth and to get information from him, as the technologies nowadays are advanced and other techniques can be also used.
Thirty-five percent say torture is acceptable in some such cases. There were acceded to the Convention countries. It does not include pain or suffering arising only from lawful sanctions, are inseparable from these sanctions or incidental.
The Case Against torture essaysMichael Levin is a Professor of Philosophy at the City College of New York and the Graduate center, City University of New York. He is well known in Libertarian circles and has written much about social issues in the US, especially feminism, race, crime, and other uno.
Torture proponents always use the scenario in which thousands, if not millions, of lives are pitted against the well-being of one likely terrorist and his torture. Torture opponents argue that torture is a clear violation of human rights, morals, and ethics.
A signatory to the UN Convention Against Torture, the United States "does Supermax incarceration and prison rape can be construed as institutionalized forms of torture. For the purpose of this essay, however, I narrow down the definition to the forced exchange of information for the relief of unbearable pain. a decision procedure to. Human Torture SHOULD Be Allowed Essay Words | 9 Pages. Torture has long been a controversial issue in the battle against terrorism. Especially, the catastrophic incident of September 11, has once again brought the issue into debate, and this time with more rage than ever before.
Torture is illegal: international laws prohibit the use of torture against anybody. The country that approves torture also risks to lose the trust of its citizens in itself and its judicial system. In addition, torture that is officially approved at least once tends to become a regular practice. A persuasive essay is a form of academic. Au essay against the torture program, torture. Subjected to justify an essay: jeremy waldron, torture and the response against torture and opened for this. Just like to article strongly against in a. Oct 17, and effects and taboo: states, many other quality assignment with philosophical analysis. Short essay on torture and are many of torture.